Supreme Court Calls Honest Service Law "Too Vague"
Section 1346 of Chapter 63 of the U.S. Code identifies a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services as being included in the definition of the term "scheme or artifice to defraud." This is also known as the "Honest Service Law." The law was passed by Congress in 1988.
Federal prosecutors in Florida have used the honest service law to go after allegedly dishonest public officials in Palm Beach and Broward counties. Those affected included three Palm Beach county commissioners, a Broward county school board member and a Miramar city commissioner.
South Florida judges have expressed concern over the imprecise language of the law, saying that it fails to clearly outline what behavior is prohibited. The US Supreme Court agrees, with justices calling the law "mushy" and "vaguely written." They argue that an ordinary citizen should be able to easily determine what is considered legal and illegal conduct.
But even if the US Supreme Court strikes down the law, criminals who have pleaded guilty to honest services fraud won't be off the hook for their crimes. The cases against them are supported by overwhelming evidence of illegal acts, and their own confessions of guilt in open court.
Florida State Senator Dan Gelber is attempting to convince the Florida legislature to adopt a statewide version of the law. He has said that his version of the bill will be much more sharply focused and will concentrate on corruption of public officials. He says he will modify his bill based on concerns expressed by the US Supreme Court justices.
Find out more about the controversy over honest services fraud at `Honest Services Fraud' law mushy but necessary.
If you need clarification on any Florida business law, please contact Wood, Atter & Wolf, P.A. for legal counsel.
